TV Shows BuzzVerdict

Schitt's Creek

4.3 / 5

2015 · 6 Seasons · CBC / Pop TV · Comedy


Schitt’s Creek debuted on CBC in Canada in January 2015 with a premise built for comedy: a wealthy family loses everything and is forced to relocate to a small rural town they once bought as a joke. Created by father-and-son team Eugene and Dan Levy, the show starred Eugene as the family patriarch, Catherine O’Hara as his eccentric wife, Dan as their pansexual son, and Annie Murphy as their socialite daughter. On paper, it’s a fish-out-of-water setup with a shelf life of maybe two seasons before the joke wears thin.

What actually happened is that the show used that premise as a starting point for one of the most emotionally rich character transformations in recent comedy history. The Roses begin as people defined by their wealth and the superficiality it enabled. Over six seasons, they’re stripped of every crutch and forced to build real relationships with the eccentric residents of their new home. The comedy shifts gradually from laughing at the family’s helplessness to laughing with them as they discover what matters to them beyond money and status.

Audiences grew slowly, building word-of-mouth momentum season after season until its final year swept the 2020 Emmy Awards, winning all seven comedy categories in a historic achievement. That trajectory, from an obscure Canadian comedy to the biggest winner in Emmy history, mirrors the show’s own themes of unexpected growth in unlikely places.

Schitt’s Creek’s Characters Commands Attention

Character development is the engine that powers everything. Each member of the Rose family undergoes a meaningful transformation across six seasons, and the show takes its time with every arc. David’s journey from a self-absorbed, anxiety-riddled snob to someone capable of vulnerability and lasting partnership is the show’s emotional centerpiece. Alexis’s evolution from a vapid socialite whose past adventures are played for absurdist laughs to a self-sufficient young woman building her own career might be even more satisfying. Moira’s theatrical eccentricity and Johnny’s stubborn dignity both soften and deepen without losing the qualities that make them funny.

Catherine O’Hara’s performance as Moira Rose is a masterclass in comedic specificity. Her vocal affectations, her wardrobe of elaborate wigs, her dramatic delivery of even the most mundane observations, all of it creates a character who could have been a one-note caricature but instead becomes one of the most quotable, layered comedic creations on television. O’Hara finds emotional truth in the most absurd moments, and her relationship with Eugene Levy’s quietly exasperated Johnny provides the show with a romantic partnership that feels lived-in and real despite its over-the-top trappings.

LGBTQ+ storylines set a new standard for representation on television. David’s pansexuality is never treated as an issue, a conflict, or a coming-out narrative. His relationship with Patrick is presented with the same warmth, humor, and occasional awkwardness as any other romantic storyline on the show. In the world of Schitt’s Creek, nobody questions, challenges, or creates drama around anyone’s sexuality. This wasn’t an oversight. It was a deliberate creative choice that resonated powerfully with audiences who were used to seeing queer relationships defined by the obstacles around them rather than the love within them.

Supporting players among Schitt’s Creek residents add texture and warmth to the show’s world. Characters who could have been punchlines, the small-town locals existing purely for the Roses to bounce off, are given their own arcs and their own dignity. The town isn’t a joke. It’s a community that has something to teach the family that landed in it, and the show respects that dynamic throughout.

Schitt’s Creek’s Season Quality Problem

The first season is a well-documented hurdle. The Roses are deliberately unlikable at the start, and the comedy relies heavily on their entitlement and discomfort in ways that can feel mean-spirited before the show’s warmer instincts kick in. Multiple fan communities report that viewers abandon the show during this stretch, and the most common recommendation from devoted fans is to push past the first handful of episodes before deciding. A show that requires an apology for its opening chapter has a built-in accessibility problem, no matter how good what follows turns out to be.

Pacing operates at a different speed than most modern sitcoms. Schitt’s Creek doesn’t try to match the jokes-per-minute output of faster shows, and viewers coming from punchline-heavy comedies may find the pacing slow. The humor is character-driven and often quiet, rooted in eccentric behavior and the awkwardness of personal growth rather than sharp setups and payoffs. This is a feature for many viewers, but it’s a legitimate barrier for those who want their comedies to hit harder and faster.

Certain characters walk a fine line between endearing and irritating that doesn’t always fall on the right side. David’s self-absorption, while central to his arc, can test patience in episodes where his growth stalls or reverses. Moira’s theatricality is calibrated brilliantly by O’Hara, but some viewers find the vocal performance more distracting than funny. The show’s tone is gentle enough that characters who rub you the wrong way have nowhere to hide. A sharper, meaner comedy can offset an annoying character with the humor around them. Schitt’s Creek doesn’t have that buffer, so if a character isn’t working for you, there’s less to compensate.

A relentlessly positive worldview is the show’s defining quality, but it also creates a ceiling on dramatic tension. Conflict in Schitt’s Creek is almost always resolved through communication, love, and understanding. Nobody is truly malicious, no relationship is beyond repair, and the town itself is a kind of utopian community where acceptance is universal. This is comforting and admirable as a creative choice, but it does mean that stakes rarely feel high enough to generate real suspense. You’re never worried that things won’t work out, and for some viewers, that predictability dulls the emotional impact.

A Show That Gets Better as It Goes

Most comedies peak in their middle seasons and decline toward the end. Schitt’s Creek inverts that pattern, improving steadily from its weakest opening to a final season that many fans consider the show’s best work. This upward trajectory is unusual enough to be worth noting as its own achievement. The writers didn’t just maintain quality over six seasons. They built momentum, deepening character arcs and raising emotional stakes with each year. By the time the finale arrives, the payoff feels earned in a way that few comedies manage, precisely because the show took the slow road to get there.

Should You Watch Schitt’s Creek?

Schitt’s Creek is for viewers who value character growth over joke density and prefer their comedy warm rather than cutting. It’s an ideal show for people who want to invest in a fictional family and watch them become better versions of themselves over time. If you respond to comedy that makes you feel something beyond laughter, this is one of the best options available.

Skip it if you need your comedies to be funny from episode one, or if a show where everyone is ultimately kind and accepting feels too removed from reality to engage with. Schitt’s Creek asks you to buy into its gentle worldview, and if you can’t, the experience will feel hollow.

The Verdict on Schitt’s Creek

Schitt’s Creek asks for patience and rewards it with one of the most satisfying character journeys in modern comedy. The Rose family starts as a group of shallow, entitled people you’d cross the street to avoid, and by the finale they’ve become characters you’re devastated to leave behind. That transformation is the show’s greatest trick, and it works because the writing earns every emotional beat through humor rather than sentimentality. The first season is a hurdle that loses some viewers, and the comedy never reaches the joke density of faster-paced sitcoms. But what it does instead, building a world where acceptance is the default and growth happens through connection, is rarer and more valuable than another show competing for laughs per minute.