Skip to content
Movies BuzzVerdict

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

4.2 / 5
How we rate

2024 · George Miller · 148 min · Action


The question hanging over Furiosa before its release was whether anything could follow Mad Max: Fury Road without feeling like a step down. That 2015 film redefined what action cinema could be, and a prequel exploring the backstory of Charlize Theron’s Furiosa seemed like it was inviting an unflattering comparison. George Miller, who was seventy-nine during production, answered by making a completely different kind of film. Where Fury Road was a single chase stretched across two hours, Furiosa is an origin story told across five chapters and fifteen years, closer in structure to an epic than a pursuit.

The film opened in May 2024 to strong critical reception but disappointing box office numbers. The conversation quickly split between those comparing it unfavorably to Fury Road and those appreciating it as its own distinct achievement. Over time, the consensus has shifted toward recognition that Miller made something more ambitious than a sequel, even if the execution doesn’t always match Fury Road’s perfection.

Wasteland Warfare and the Weight of Revenge

The action set pieces are extraordinary, which shouldn’t be surprising from Miller but is still worth stating. A mid-film convoy attack ranks among the best action sequences of the decade, a sprawling, multi-vehicle battle that unfolds with a spatial clarity most directors can’t achieve in a single room. Miller’s ability to stage large-scale chaos while maintaining a clear sense of who is where, what’s at stake, and how the geography of the fight is shifting remains unmatched. The practical stunt work is jaw-dropping, with real vehicles, real crashes, and real human beings performing feats that would be unbelievable if you couldn’t see them happening on screen.

Chris Hemsworth’s Dementus is the film’s most electric element. Playing a charismatic warlord whose buffoonery masks genuine menace, Hemsworth goes bigger than anything in his career and somehow makes it work. Dementus is funny, terrifying, and pathetic, sometimes within the same scene. He’s a villain who believes his own mythology and crumbles when reality doesn’t cooperate. The performance could easily have tipped into parody, but Hemsworth finds the sadness inside the spectacle, creating a character who haunts the film long after his role in the plot diminishes.

Anya Taylor-Joy carries the title role with a physicality and intensity that makes the transition from Theron feel natural rather than jarring. Her Furiosa is defined less by dialogue than by presence. The anger is always visible, controlled but never extinguished, and her journey from captive child to the warrior we meet in Fury Road is given the mythic weight Miller clearly intended. The decision to have young Furiosa played by Alyla Browne for a significant portion of the film pays off, allowing the story to earn its time jumps rather than rushing to the version audiences already know.

The world-building is the film’s biggest expansion on the franchise. We see the Citadel before Immortan Joe’s full consolidation of power, the politics between wasteland factions, the economics of water and fuel, and the internal power struggles that shape the world Fury Road dropped us into without explanation. For fans who wanted to understand how this society works, Furiosa delivers answers without sacrificing mystique.

Miller’s visual storytelling remains among the best in cinema. Entire character dynamics are communicated through composition, movement, and physical gesture. Dialogue is sparse, and the film trusts the audience to read situations through action rather than exposition.

The CGI Compromise and the Chapter Problem

The increased use of CGI is the most frequent criticism, and it’s valid. Fury Road achieved its legendary status partly through an insistence on practical effects that gave every crash and explosion a tangible, dangerous weight. Furiosa relies more heavily on digital effects, particularly for landscape shots, sky replacements, and some of the larger action beats. Most of the time it’s serviceable, but certain shots have a smoothness that breaks the gritty, physical reality the franchise is known for. A few scenes, particularly in the early chapters, look noticeably artificial.

The five-chapter structure creates pacing issues that Fury Road avoided entirely. Each chapter functions almost as its own short film, with its own setup, escalation, and resolution. The transitions between them can feel abrupt, and the momentum that builds during an action sequence sometimes dissipates when the film jumps forward in time. The middle chapters, covering Furiosa’s years under Immortan Joe’s control, are necessarily slower and more political, which is interesting but tests the patience of viewers expecting constant adrenaline.

At 148 minutes, the film is longer than Fury Road by twenty minutes, and it feels longer than that. The epic scope that makes the story work also means the film occasionally lingers in places where a tighter edit would serve it better. Not every chapter earns its length, and a few scenes feel like they exist for world-building rather than because the story demands them.

The box office underperformance has sparked debate about whether the film was marketed poorly, released at the wrong time, or simply couldn’t overcome the comparison to its predecessor. Whatever the reason, the commercial result doesn’t reflect the quality on screen.

Revenge as a Slow Burn

Furiosa’s most interesting creative choice is its patience. Where Fury Road was propulsive, this film is cumulative. Furiosa’s transformation isn’t a single dramatic moment but a series of losses, adaptations, and decisions that harden her over years. The film earns the character we already know by showing us everything that was taken from her and everything she chose to become in response. That slow-burn approach won’t satisfy everyone, but for viewers willing to invest in the journey, the payoff is substantial.

The relationship between Furiosa and Dementus works because Miller understands that revenge stories are really about what the pursuit of revenge costs. By the time their paths converge for the last time, the film has layered enough history between them that the resolution carries genuine emotional weight.

Should You Ride Into the Wasteland Again?

If Fury Road is one of your favorite action films, Furiosa is essential viewing, though you’ll need to accept that it’s chasing different goals. Anyone who enjoys epic-scale storytelling with real visual ambition will find a lot to admire, even without connection to the franchise. Skip it if you want another pure adrenaline chase film. Furiosa is slower, longer, and more interested in character than spectacle, though the spectacle, when it arrives, is remarkable. Go in expecting an origin story told at epic scale, and the Wasteland still has plenty to offer.

The Verdict on Furiosa

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga is not Fury Road, and it’s better for accepting that from the start. George Miller used the prequel format to build something broader and more emotionally complex than a sequel could have been, anchored by Taylor-Joy’s ferocious lead performance and Hemsworth’s career-best villain. The CGI reliance and chapter structure prevent it from reaching the pure-cinema heights of its predecessor, but the ambition on display, from an octogenarian filmmaker no less, is remarkable. The Wasteland got bigger, and the story of how Furiosa became Furiosa was worth telling.